DokuWiki

You've loaded an old revision of the document! If you save it, you will create a new version with this data.

=====Reikwijdte Artikel 273 Btw-RL=====
  - [[Reikwijdte Artikel 273 Btw-RL#Aantekeningen|Aantekeningen]]
  - [[Reikwijdte Artikel 273 Btw-RL#Regelgeving|Regelgeving]]
  - [[Reikwijdte Artikel 273 Btw-RL#Jurisprudentie|Jurisprudentie]]
  - [[Reikwijdte Artikel 273 Btw-RL#Literatuur|Literatuur]]

----

====1.	Aantekeningen====
I believe A-G Saugmandsgaard was very correct in his opinion of 18 March last week in case C‑855/19 (‘G’) when he indicated that an obligation laid down by a Member State under Art 273 must be compatible with the other provisions of the VAT directive.

----

====2.	Regelgeving====

----

====3.	Jurisprudentie====

- Case C-96/91 (Commission of the European Communities v. the Kingdom of Spain)
  - Case C-217/94 (Eismann Alto Adige Srl v. Ufficio Imposta sul Valore Aggiunto di Bolzano)
  - Joined Cases C-110/98 to C-147/98 (Gabalfrisa SL and Others v. Agencia Estatal de Administracin Tributaria (AEAT)
  - Case C-384/04 ((1) Commissioners of Customs and Excise (2) H.M. Attorney-General v. Federation of Technological Industries and 53 others)
  - Case C-146/05 (Albert Collée)
  - Case C-188/09 (Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Białymstoku v. Profaktor’ Kulesza, Frankowski, Trzaska spółka jawna w Białymstoku)
  - Joined Cases C-80/11 and C-142/11 (Mahagében kft and Péter Dávid)
  - Case C-284/11 (EMS Bulgaria TRANSPORT OOD v. Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto’ pri Tsentralno Upravlenie na Natsionalnata Agentsia po Prihodite gr. Plovdiv)
  - Case C-259/12 (Teritorialna direktsia na Natsionalnata Agentsia za Prihodite – Plovdiv v. “RODOPI-М 91” OOD)
  - Case C-144/14 (Cabinet Medical Veterinar)
  - Case C-24/15 (Josef Plöckl v. Finanzamt Schrobenhausen)
  - Case C-574/15 (Criminal proceedings against Mauro Scialdone)
  - Case C-576/15 (ЕТ ‘Maya Marinova’ v. Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ Veliko Tarnovo pri Tsentralno upravlenie na natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite)
  - Case C-101/16 (SC Paper Consult SRL v. Direcţia Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca, Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Bistriţa-Năsăud)
  - Case C-307/16 (Stanisław Pieńkowski v. Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Lublinie)
  - Case C-534/16 (Tax Directorate of the Slovak Republic v. BB construct s.r.o)
  - Case C-69/17 (Gamesa Wind România)
  - Case C-81/17 (Zabrus Siret SRL v. Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Iaşi – Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Suceava)
  - Case C-672/17 (Tratave)
  - Case C-9/19 (SC Mitliv Exim)
  - case C-1/21 (MC)

----

====4.	Literatuur====

----

Edit summary

Note: By editing this page you agree to license your content under the following license: CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International